Right Wing Nut Job
I can't find the racist part
Published on June 22, 2010 By BONEHEADdb In Politics

Can you believe this load? First the feds file suite against Arizona and now mexico has to stick their nose into it.

From the article:

In filing the brief, Mexico said it was upholding its duty to protect its nationals in the United States and ensure that they are not discriminated against based on their ethnicity

Keep your nationals in mexico and keep your nose out of our business.

I have read this bill(sb1070)and I just can't find the part(s) that promote racial profiling. Maybe one of you intellectuals could help me out here. Just point me in the right direction.

If this bill is overturned there is something bad wrong in this country.


Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Jun 25, 2010
on Jun 25, 2010

Locamama

The feds are not enforcing the law so Arizona has do it for them. It's called self preservation. Do you think they are going though all this trouble because they are a bunch of racist having fun? They are desperate.

That is why Arizona is taking the safety of its citizens into its own hands. It IS the responsibility of the feds. But they have told all of us they are refusing to do their job.


I don't think this is true.  The border patrol is doing a good job of securing the border.  The result is that workers who used to travel back and forth betweenh the US and Mexico now stay in the US.  Crime is actually down and immigrants commit less crime than citizens. 

 

 

What you THINK is true is not important. What IS true is what matters. The boarder patrol may be doing a good job but the boarder is not secure. It won't be secure without a wall. And we are not talking about immigrants we are talking about illegal invaders.

on Jun 25, 2010

BONEHEADdb
SB 1070 link

thank you

on Jun 25, 2010

The question in my mind is: "How do we control the influx of immigrants into this country?" I have my own ideas, but am afraid they are just built upon what I've seen and is already done, and done successfully, on US military bases in other countries around the world. Walls and guns. But I do believe we can be more creative.
  The fact is that the jobs are the magnet.  We want to make the problem about THEM when it is our citizens who are hiring them. 

if this is the case then you certainly cannot support the democrats here either.

I don't support the democrats.  There is no political party for me.  That would be a reasonable party  that works for solutions instead of just trying to perpetuate their own agendas. 

on Jun 25, 2010

The question in my mind is: "How do we control the influx of immigrants into this country?" I have my own ideas, but am afraid they are just built upon what I've seen and is already done, and done successfully, on US military bases in other countries around the world. Walls and guns. But I do believe we can be more creative.
  The fact is that the jobs are the magnet.  We want to make the problem about THEM when it is our citizens who are hiring them. 

if this is the case then you certainly cannot support the democrats here either.

I don't support the democrats.  There is no political party for me.  That would be a reasonable party  that works for solutions instead of just trying to perpetuate their own agendas. 

on Jun 25, 2010

The fact is that the jobs are the magnet. We want to make the problem about THEM when it is our citizens who are hiring them.

That is the "humanitarian" line and is partially true.  However, the sad fact is that not all the illegals are "just looking for work".  Indeed, the ones that have taken over part of the Buenos Aires National park are not, nor are the murders, coyotes, drug runners and cartel members.

We can bleed our hearts and say "ah, so sad" to the poor faces the ignorant media portrays these people as.  All the while ignoring the criminals playing on the stupidity of both the MSM and DC politicians.

Again, I would suggest all Google the Prince William law that was enacted 3 years ago and the impact it has had.  The only difference between it and Arizona is that the police have to check the immigration status of everyone who is stopped for cause, they have no discretion.

on Jun 25, 2010

JU seems to be behaving today, so oops #1

on Jun 25, 2010

and #2

on Jun 26, 2010

Indeed, the ones that have taken over part of the Buenos Aires National park are not, nor are the murders, coyotes, drug runners and cartel members.
The criminals should be prosecuted regardless of their residency status.  The vast majority of the undocumented are not criminals.  The right just wants to villify them by portraying them all as violent criminals which is just not true.  The supporters of this law want to say it is to decrease crime but crime is already decreasing.  http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/05/02/20100502arizona-border-violence-mexico.html

on Jun 26, 2010

The vast majority of the undocumented are not criminals.

They all are criminals, why should we be bothered with sorting the good form the bad.

 

The supporters of this law want to say it is to decrease crime but crime is already decreasing.

 

Just because arrest are down does not mean crime is down.

Did you know the boarder patrol rounded up 500 invaders in one day on Robert Krentz's ranch? He was a man who would bring food and water to trespassers if they needed it and they shot him down. "the boarder is safer now than ever"

on Jun 26, 2010

The vast majority of the undocumented are not criminals.

Let's translate that into English:

The vast majority of illegal aliens, who committed a crime by coming here illegally in circumventing our immigration laws, are not professional criminals.

I believe that to be true of those already in-country.  But a quite sizable minority are professional criminals.  And until we control the border, we can't shut off the influx of that sizable minority which, in the current US employment environment, may well be in fact a sizable majority of those currently entering illegally.

What to do about all the 'undocumented' resident non-professional criminals once the border is controlled is another subject.  I strongly suspect we would (and shall) deal with that problem compassionately but resolutely once the border is a border again.

on Jun 26, 2010

The vast majority of the undocumented are not criminals.

Prove it.  Links?  Sources?  Opinions go at the bottom.

And just so you do not waste your time, ALL ARE CRIMINALS.  They already broke the law.  So perhaps you want to qualify your assertion?

on Jun 26, 2010

The supporters of this law want to say it is to decrease crime but crime is already decreasing. http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/05/02/20100502arizona-border-violence-mexico.html

One town that is not even on the border (just ask the democrat from Wisconsin) and that is some type of proof?  Ok, where are the other 100 articles from the other "non" border states/cities?  That berg does not cover the entire border, now does it?

on Jun 26, 2010

Locamama
The right just wants to villify them by portraying them all as violent criminals which is just not true.

And here your problem, you are a bigot. By right what do you mean? "rednecks"? "hicks"? "farm people"? "god nuts"?

You believe they simply wish to vilify. Yet you conveniently ignore evidence and fact. There is a huge crime problem in arizona, they are trying to cut it down, this is all. No villification. No rounding up of all mexicans. just fighting against a surmountable tide of crime.

on Jun 26, 2010

And here your problem, you are a bigot. By right what do you mean? "rednecks"? "hicks"? "farm people"? "god nuts"?

Good point!

5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5